A Rasch Re-Analysis of the Partnership Questionnaire | Zendy

Sören Kliem | Zendy; Johannes Beller | Zendy; Christoph Kröger | Zendy; Yve StöbelRichter | Zendy; Kurt Hahlweg | Zendy; Elmar Brähler | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

A Rasch Re-Analysis of the Partnership Questionnaire

Author(s) -

Sören Kliem,

Johannes Beller,

Christoph Kröger,

Yve StöbelRichter,

Kurt Hahlweg,

Elmar Brähler

Publication year - 2015

Publication title -

sage open

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.357

H-Index - 32

ISSN - 2158-2440

DOI - 10.1177/2158244015588958

Subject(s) - rasch model , polytomous rasch model , psychology , checklist , german , sample (material) , population , clinical psychology , applied psychology , psychometrics , item response theory , developmental psychology , medicine , chemistry , cognitive psychology , environmental health , archaeology , chromatography , history

The Partnership Questionnaire (PFB) is used favorably in the Germanlanguage area to measure partnership quality. The goal of the present study is tore-analyze the subscales of the PFB (Conflict Behavior, Tenderness, Communication) viathe Rasch model. Polytomous and dichotomous Rasch models were calculated in a populationsample (N = 1,123) and a student-based cross-validation sample (N = 250) for the threesubscales of the PFB. Final models were chosen based on several fit criteria. Good tovery good model fit was obtained with symmetrical (Conflict Behavior) or nonsymmetrical(Tenderness, Communication) dichotomously collapsed categories. After adapting theinstruction and dichotomizing the categories, the PFB can be used as a checklist(PFB-checklist). An additional cross-validation is needed to substantiate the obtainedresults

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research