English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Scholars have long studied the effect of corrective feedbackstrategies on the writing ability of language learners, but few have formed designs inwhich more than three feedback strategies have been used. In this research, the ultimategoal was to discover how International English Language Testing System (IELTS-)candidates could be helped to perform better in the writing component of the test withthe feedback they get. To this end, 186 learners attending IELTS preparation classes inthree different English language institutes participated in this quasi-experimentalstudy. A one-way ANOVA was run to discover the significant difference among the sixgroups. The findings proposed that Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’writing ability improved as a result of the employment of writing feedback strategiesbut that reformulation strategy was the most effective one. Teachers can, thus, benefitfrom the finding of this research by studying the way they should tackle the learners’inaccurate productions as far as different writing score band descriptors areconcerned

The Effect of Six Different Corrective Feedback Strategies on Iranian English Language Learners’ IELTS Writing Task 2