Open AccessPredicting Clinical Outcome in Expanded Criteria Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Author(s) -
Paramita SahaChaudhuri,
Carly Rabin,
Jean Tchervenkov,
Dana Baran,
Justin Morein,
Ruth SapirPichhadze
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
canadian journal of kidney health and disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.742
H-Index - 20
ISSN - 2054-3581
DOI - 10.1177/2054358120924305
Subject(s) - medicine , hazard ratio , proportional hazards model , retrospective cohort study , renal function , dialysis , kidney transplantation , transplantation , cohort , surgery , univariate analysis , confidence interval , multivariate analysis
Background: The gaps in organ supply and demand necessitate the use of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys. Objective: To identify which pre-transplant and post-transplant predictors are most informative regarding short- and long-term ECD transplant outcomes. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Single center, Quebec, Canada. Patients: The patients were 163 consecutive first-time ECD kidney only transplant recipients who underwent transplantation at McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2014 and had frozen section wedge procurement biopsies. Measurements: Short-term graft outcomes, including delayed graft function and 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as well as long-term outcomes including all-cause graft loss (defined as return to dialysis, retransplantation, and death with function). Methods: Pre-transplant donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics were assessed as predictors of transplant outcomes. The added value of post-transplant predictors, including longitudinal eGFR, was also assessed using time-varying Cox proportional hazards models. Results: In univariate analyses, among the pre-transplant donor characteristics, histopathologic variables did not show evidence of association with delayed graft function, 1-year post-transplant eGFR or all cause graft loss. Recipient age was associated with all-cause graft loss (hazard ratio: 1.038 [95% confidence interval: 1.002-1.075] and the model produced only modest discrimination (C-index: 0.590; standard error [SE]: 0.045). Inclusion of time-dependent post-transplant eGFR improved the model’s prediction accuracy (C-index: 0.711; SE = 0.047). Pre-transplant ECD characteristics were not associated with long-term survival, whereas post-transplant characteristics allowed better model discrimination. Limitations: Single-center study, small sample size, and potential incomplete capture of all covariate data. Conclusions: Incorporation of dynamic prediction models into electronic health records may enable timely mitigation of ECD graft failure risk and/or facilitate planning for renal replacement therapies. Histopathologic findings on preimplantation biopsies have a limited role in predicting long-term ECD outcomes. Trial registration: Not applicable.