Open AccessEndoscopic management of 345 small rectal neuroendocrine tumours: A national study from the French group of endocrine tumours (GTE)
Author(s) -
Fine Caroline,
Roquin Guillaume,
Terrebonne Eric,
Lecomte Thierry,
Coriat Romain,
Do Cao Christine,
Mestier Louis,
Coffin Elise,
Cadiot Guillaume,
Nicolli Patricia,
Lepiliez Vincent,
Hautefeuille Vincent,
Ramos Jeanne,
Girot Paul,
Dominguez Sophie,
Céphise Fritz-Line V,
Forestier Julien,
Hervieu Valérie,
Pioche Mathieu,
Walter Thomas
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
ueg journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.667
H-Index - 35
eISSN - 2050-6414
pISSN - 2050-6406
DOI - 10.1177/2050640619861883
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , lymphovascular invasion , endoscopy , neuroendocrine tumors , colorectal cancer , pathological , surgery , endoscopic mucosal resection , gastroenterology , metastasis , cancer
Small rectal neuroendocrine tumours are good candidates for endoscopic resection provided that complete pathological resection (R0) is obtained and their risk of metastatic progression is low. We conducted a large multicentre nationwide study to evaluate the outcomes of the management of non‐metastatic rectal neuroendocrine tumours ≤2 cm diagnosed endoscopically. Patients and methods The medical records, the endoscopic and pathological findings of patients with non‐metastatic rectal neuroendocrine tumours ≤2 cm managed from January 2000–June 2018 in 16 French hospitals, were retrospectively analysed. The primary objective was to describe the proportion of R0 endoscopic resections. Results A total of 329 patients with 345 rectal neuroendocrine tumours were included, 330 (96%) tumours were managed by local treatments: 287 by endoscopy only and 43 by endoscopy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. The final endoscopic R0 rate was 134/345 (39%), which improved from the first endoscopy (54/225, 24%), to the second (60/100, 60%) and the third endoscopy (20/26, 77%). R0 was associated with endoscopic technique (90% for advanced techniques, 40% for mucosectomy and 17% for polypectomy), but not with tumour or patient characteristics. Twenty patients had metastatic disease, which was associated with tumour size ≥10 mm (odds ratio: 9.1, 95% confidence interval (3.5–23.5)), tumour grade G2–G3 (odds ratio: 4.2, (1.5–11.7)), the presence of muscular (odds ratio: ∞, (11.9–∞)) and lymphovascular invasion (odds ratio: 57.2, (5.6–578.9)). Conclusions The resection of small rectal neuroendocrine tumours often requires multiple procedures. Training of endoscopists is necessary in order to better recognise these tumours and to perform the appropriate resection technique.