
Compliance with the faecal calprotectin test in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Author(s) -
Maréchal Chloé,
AimoneGastin Isabelle,
Baumann Cédric,
Dirrenberger Bastien,
Guéant JeanLouis,
PeyrinBiroulet Laurent
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
ueg journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.667
H-Index - 35
eISSN - 2050-6414
pISSN - 2050-6406
DOI - 10.1177/2050640616686517
Subject(s) - medicine , calprotectin , faecal calprotectin , inflammatory bowel disease , gastroenterology , feces , test (biology) , constipation , disease , paleontology , biology
Background We investigated, for the first time, levels of compliance with faecal calprotectin test in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Methods All consecutive adult inflammatory bowel disease patients having been prescribed an faecal calprotectin test between December 2014–July 2015 were included. At their next visit to the hospital, patients had to return a stool sample for the faecal calprotectin test and answer a simple questionnaire: ‘Have you brought a stool sample? If not, why not? If so, did you encounter any difficulties when collecting the sample? Were you aware of faecal calprotectin before being asked to take the test?'. Results One hundred and one patients were included (50 men; 77 patients with Crohn’s disease). The range age was 40 years (19–68). Eighty‐nine patients were being treated with infliximab, 10 were on vedolizumab, and two were not being treated with a biologic. Thirty‐seven patients (35%) had performed the faecal calprotectin test. Eighty‐one patients (80%) had not been aware of faecal calprotectin before being asked to take the test. Of the 64 patients who did not take the test, the prime reasons for non‐compliance were forgetfulness ( n = 49, 76.6%), a lack of perceived benefit for the test ( n = 7, 11%), constipation ( n = 5, 7.8%), refusal to handle faeces ( n = 2, 3.1%), and difficulty collecting the stool sample ( n = 1, 1.5%). Conclusion Only one‐third of the patients performed the faecal calprotectin test. The main reason for non‐compliance was forgetfulness. Our present results emphasise the need for better patient education on the importance of complying with faecal calprotectin testing and the future of faecal calprotectin testing at home.