UEG Week 2016 Poster Presentations

legend N2D N1D 2LPEG N2D vs. 2LPEG N1D vs. 2LPEG EFFICACY Primary analysis set, n1⁄4 275 Primary analysis set, n1⁄4 275 Primary analysis set, n1⁄4 272 Primary endpoint: Patients with successful overall bowel cleansing efficacy (HCS) [n] 253 (92.0%) 245 (89.1%) 238 (87.5%) -4.00%* [0.055] -6.91%* [0.328] Supportive secondary endpoint: Patients with successful overall bowel cleansing efficacy (BBPS) [n] 249 (90.5%) 243 (88.4%) 232 (85.3%) n.a. n.a. Primary endpoint: Excellent plus Good cleansing rate in colon ascendens (primary analysis set) [n] 87 (31.6%) 93 (33.8%) 41 (15.1%) 8.11%* [50.001] 10.32%* [50.001] Key secondary endpoint: Adenoma detection rate, colon ascendens 11.6% 11.6% 8.1% -4.80%; 12.00%** [0.106] -4.80%; 12.00%** [0.106] Key secondary endpoint: Adenoma detection rate, overall colon 26.6% 27.6% 26.8% -8.47%; 8.02%** [0.569] -7.65%; 9.11%** [0.455] Key secondary endpoint: Polyp detection rate, colon ascendens 23.3% 18.6% 16.2% -1.41%; 15.47%** [0.024] -6.12%; 10.82%** [0.268] Key secondary endpoint: Polyp detection rate, overall colon 44.0% 45.1% 44.5% -8.85%; 8.00%** [0.579] –7.78%; 9.09%** [0.478] Compliance rates (min 75% of both doses taken) [n] 235 (85.5%) 233 (84.7%) 245 (90.1%) n.a. n.a. SAFETY Safety set, n1⁄4 262 Safety set, n1⁄4 269 Safety set, n1⁄4 263 All treatment-emergent adverse events [n] 77 89 53 n.a. n.a. Patients with any related treatment-emergent adverse event [n] 30 (11.5%) 40 (14.9%) 20 (7.6%) n.a. n.a. *1⁄4 97.5% 1-sided CI; **1⁄4 95% 2-sided CI; n.a.1⁄4 not applicable. United European Gastroenterology Journal 4(5S) A219