Open AccessWhole‐liver CT texture analysis in colorectal cancer: Does the presence of liver metastases affect the texture of the remaining liver?
Author(s) -
Rao Sheng-Xiang,
Lambregts Doenja MJ,
Schnerr Roald S,
van Ommen Wenzel,
van Nijnatten Thiemo JA,
Martens Milou H,
Heijnen Luc A,
Backes Walter H,
Verhoef Cornelis,
Zeng Meng-Su,
Beets Geerard L,
Beets-Tan Regina GH
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
ueg journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.667
H-Index - 35
eISSN - 2050-6414
pISSN - 2050-6406
DOI - 10.1177/2050640614552463
Subject(s) - medicine , colorectal cancer , liver parenchyma , occult , gastroenterology , radiology , metastasis , cancer , pathology , alternative medicine
Background Liver metastases limit survival in colorectal cancer. Earlier detection of (occult) metastatic disease may benefit treatment and survival. Objective The objective of this article is to evaluate the potential of whole‐liver CT texture analysis of apparently disease‐free liver parenchyma for discriminating between colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with and without hepatic metastases. Methods The primary staging CT examinations of 29 CRC patients were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into three groups: patients without liver metastases ( n = 15), with synchronous liver metastases ( n = 10) and metachronous liver metastases within 18 months following primary staging ( n = 4). Whole‐liver texture analysis was performed by delineation of the apparently non‐diseased liver parenchyma (excluding metastases or other focal liver lesions) on portal phase images. Mean grey‐level intensity (M), entropy (E) and uniformity (U) were derived with no filtration and different filter widths (0.5 = fine, 1.5 = medium, 2.5 = coarse). Results Mean E 1.5 and E 2.5 for the whole liver in patients with synchronous metastases were significantly higher compared with the non‐metastatic patients ( p = 0.02 and p = 0.01). Mean U 1.5 and U 2.5 were significantly lower in the synchronous metastases group compared with the non‐metastatic group ( p = 0.04 and p = 0.02). Texture parameters for the metachronous metastases group were not significantly different from the non‐metastatic group or synchronous metastases group ( p > 0.05), although – similar to the synchronous metastases group – there was a subtle trend towards increased E 1.5 , E 2.5 and decreased U 1.5 , U 2.5 values. Areas under the ROC curve for the diagnosis of synchronous metastatic disease based on the texture parameters E 1.5,2.5 and U 1.5,2.5 ranged between 0.73 and 0.78. Conclusion Texture analysis of the apparently non‐diseased liver holds promise to differentiate between CRC patients with and without metastatic liver disease. Further research is required to determine whether these findings may be used to benefit the prediction of metachronous liver disease.