Arrested Theory Development: The Misguided Distinction Between Exploratory and Confirmatory Research
Author(s) -
Aba Szollosi,
Chris Donkin
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
perspectives on psychological science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.234
H-Index - 140
eISSN - 1745-6924
pISSN - 1745-6916
DOI - 10.1177/1745691620966796
Subject(s) - criticism , flexibility (engineering) , psychology , epistemology , argument (complex analysis) , development theory , process (computing) , exploratory research , cognitive psychology , social psychology , computer science , sociology , social science , philosophy , art , statistics , biochemistry , chemistry , literature , mathematics , economics , market economy , operating system
Science progresses by finding and correcting problems in theories. Good theories are those that help facilitate this process by being hard to vary : They explain what they are supposed to explain, they are consistent with other good theories, and they are not easily adaptable to explain anything. Here we argue that, rather than a lack of distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research, an abundance of flexible theories is a better explanation for the current replicability problems of psychology. We also explain why popular methods-oriented solutions fail to address the real problem of flexibility. Instead, we propose that a greater emphasis on theory criticism by argument might improve replicability.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom