Open AccessRemote Ischemic Conditioning and Stroke Recovery
Author(s) -
Matthew W. McDonald,
Angela Dykes,
Matthew S. Jeffers,
Anthony Carter,
Ralph Nevins,
Allyson Ripley,
Gergely Silasi,
Dale Corbett
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.651
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1552-6844
pISSN - 1545-9683
DOI - 10.1177/15459683211011224
Subject(s) - medicine , neuroprotection , stroke (engine) , tissue plasminogen activator , sham surgery , anesthesia , ischemia , rehabilitation , spontaneous recovery , physical medicine and rehabilitation , physical therapy , cardiology , pathology , mechanical engineering , alternative medicine , engineering
Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a noninvasive procedure whereby several periods of ischemia are induced in a limb. Although there is growing interest in using RIC to improve stroke recovery, preclinical RIC research has focused exclusively on neuroprotection, using male animals and the intraluminal suture stroke model, and delivered RIC at times not relevant to either brain repair or behavioral recovery. In alignment with the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable, we address these shortcomings. First, a standardized session (5-minute inflation/deflation, 4 repetitions) of RIC was delivered using a cuff on the contralesional hindlimb in both male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. Using the endothelin-1 stroke model, RIC was delivered once either prestroke (18 hours before, pre-RIC) or poststroke (4 hours after, post-RIC), and infarct volume was assessed at 24 hours poststroke using magnetic resonance imaging. RIC was delivered at these times to mimic the day before a surgery where clots are possible or as a treatment similar to tissue plasminogen activator, respectively. Pre-RIC reduced infarct volume by 41% compared with 29% with post-RIC. RIC was neuroprotective in both sexes, but males had a 46% reduction of infarct volume compared with 23% in females. After confirming the acute efficacy of RIC, we applied it chronically for 4 weeks, beginning 5 days poststroke. This delayed RIC failed to enhance poststroke behavioral recovery. Based on these findings, the most promising application of RIC is during the hyperacute and early acute phases of stroke, a time when other interventions such as exercise may be contraindicated.