Photoplethysmography, an Easy and Accurate Method for Measuring Ankle Brachial Pressure Index: Can Photoplethysmography Replace Doppler?
Author(s) -
Nader Khandanpour,
Matthew P. Armon,
Barbara Jennings,
Allan Clark,
Felicity J. Meyer
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
vascular and endovascular surgery/vascular and endovascular surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1938-9116
pISSN - 1538-5744
DOI - 10.1177/1538574409334829
Subject(s) - photoplethysmogram , medicine , doppler effect , ankle , correlation coefficient , cardiology , surgery , statistics , telecommunications , computer science , mathematics , physics , astronomy , wireless
Objective: To assess the accuracy of ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) assessed by photoplethysmography (PPG) compared with continuous wave Doppler (CW-Doppler). Methods: Ankle brachial pressure index was measured in a standard manner using both PPG and Doppler probes. For PPG-ABPI, a PPG probe was placed on the index finger and great toe, and a microcomputer determined the ABPI. These values were compared with the ABPI measured manually using an 8-MHz Doppler probe. Correlation and agreement between PPG and Doppler ABPI were assessed by Lin’s correlation coefficient and Bland—Altman plots. Results: In all, 133 claudicants were assessed. There was a strong correlation between the 2 ABPI methods (β = .79 and 95% limits of agreement of —0.23 to 0.24). Conclusion: Measuring ABPI automatically using the PPG technique is an effective alternative for Doppler ABPI. PPG-ABPI is completely objective, fast, and accurate.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom