Open AccessThe Association Between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln Polymorphism and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis Including 14586 Subjects
Author(s) -
Shitong Xia,
Sihai Wu,
Minghao Wang
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
technology in cancer research and treatment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.754
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1533-0346
pISSN - 1533-0338
DOI - 10.1177/15330338211033060
Subject(s) - xrcc1 , meta analysis , odds ratio , subgroup analysis , cochrane library , medicine , confidence interval , allele , oncology , bioinformatics , genetics , genotype , biology , single nucleotide polymorphism , gene
Background: Accumulated evidence shows that DNA repair gene X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) may determine individual susceptibility to head and neck cancer (HNC) as a major DNA repair gene. However, the results from previous studies have been conflictive and inconsistent. In order to more accurately estimate and integrate the association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and HNC risk, we conducted a meta-analysis including 14586 subjects.Methods: In this meta-analysis, literatures were collected up until September 15, 2020 through multifarious retrieval strategies by searching through electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science and CNKI. The association between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and HNC was analyzed through calculating summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results: Thirty-one studies consisting of 6025 cases and 8561 controls were identified and analyzed. No significant association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms and HNC risk was found under the allelic (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82-1.07, P = 0.35), homozygous (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.81-1.21, P = 0.91), heterozygous (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.90-1.13, P = 0.91), dominant (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.85-1.29, P = 0.67) or recessive (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.80-1.08, P = 0.35) genetic models in the overall comparison. In addition, subgroup analyses according to tumor site also displayed no significant association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms and HNC risk. However, subgroup analyses based on ethnicity indicated that HNC risk was significantly related to Arg399Gln genetic heterozygous model (OR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.04-1.42, P = 0.02) and dominant model (OR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.02-1.60, P = 0.04) in Caucasians populations.Conclusion: The results from this meta-analysis suggest that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln variants (Arg/Gln and Arg/Arg+Arg/Gln) may contribute to high HNC risk among Caucasians. Further well-designed studies and larger sample sizes are needed to validate our findings.