z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System
Author(s) -
Hoàng Văn Minh,
Anh Tuấn Trần,
Vũ Thu Trang,
Tuan K Duong
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
health services insights
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.739
H-Index - 12
ISSN - 1178-6329
DOI - 10.1177/11786329211019224
Subject(s) - preparedness , business , workforce , public health , health care , medical emergency , identification (biology) , corporate governance , surge capacity , public relations , environmental health , covid-19 , nursing , medicine , disease , political science , finance , infectious disease (medical specialty) , botany , law , biology , pathology
This study examined the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) preparedness and response of the health system (HS) in Hanoi, Vietnam, and identified enabling factors and barriers. This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study was conducted in 4 urban and peri-urban districts that included some wards with COVID-19-positive cases and some without. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) analytical frameworks were used. Overall, 10% of health facilities (HFs) failed to fully implement COVID-19 risk determination; 8.8% failed to fully implement stronger community partnerships with local stakeholders to support public health (PH) preparedness; 35% and 2.5% incompletely implemented and did not implement evaluation of PH emergency operations, respectively; 10% did not identify communication channels to issue public information, alerts, warnings, and notifications; 25% incompletely implemented identification, development of guidance, and standards for information; 72.5% had good preventive and treatment collaboration; and 10% did not fully implement procedures for laboratory testing and reporting results. Enablers included sufficient infrastructure and equipment, strong leadership, and good cross-public-sector collaboration with police and military forces. Barriers included workforce constraints, overburdened and inconsistent reporting systems, inappropriate financial mechanisms, ambiguous health governance, and lack of private-sector engagement. Nonetheless, the HS preparedness and response were satisfactory, although further coordinated efforts in evaluation, coordination, communication, and volunteering remain necessary.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom