Data Recording in Performance Management
Author(s) -
Signe Groth Andersson,
Verner Denvall
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
american journal of evaluation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.964
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1557-0878
pISSN - 1098-2140
DOI - 10.1177/1098214016681510
Subject(s) - bridge (graph theory) , trustworthiness , point (geometry) , quality (philosophy) , service (business) , data quality , service quality , computer science , knowledge management , public relations , psychology , business , computer security , political science , marketing , medicine , epistemology , geometry , philosophy , mathematics
In recent years, performance management (PM) has become a buzzword in public sector organizations.Well-functioning PM systems rely on valid performance data, but critics point out thatconflicting rationale or logic among professional staff in recording information can undermine thequality of the data. Based on a case study of social service staff members, the authors explore threerecording logics. The findings reveal a complexity of recording behavior and show how frontline staffshift between recording logics according to the situation. The actual data recordings depend notonly on the overall logic but also on factors such as attitudes, assumptions, and motives. The authorssuggest that shifting recording logics weaken the validity of performance data. These shifts underminethe idea of PM as a trustworthy strategy to bridge the gap between professional and managerialstaff, as well as the possibility of a well-informed management
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom