
Adolescent Sexual Offenders: The Relationship Between Typology and Recidivism
Author(s) -
Chi Meng Chu,
Stuart Thomas
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
sexual abuse
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.272
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1573-286X
pISSN - 1079-0632
DOI - 10.1177/1079063210369011
Subject(s) - recidivism , typology , psychology , demography , cohort , confidence interval , hazard ratio , sex offense , clinical psychology , psychiatry , poison control , medicine , sexual abuse , suicide prevention , medical emergency , sociology , anthropology
Adolescent sexual offending represents an ongoing social, judicial, clinical, and policy issue for services. The current study investigated the characteristics, criminal versatility, and rates of recidivism of a cohort of 156 male adolescent sexual offenders who were referred for psychological assessments by the courts between 1996 and 2007 in Singapore. Analyses revealed that specialists (sex-only offenders; n = 71, M(follow-up) = 56.99 months, SD(follow-up) = 31.33) and generalists (criminally versatile offenders; n = 77, M (follow-up) = 67.83 months, SD(follow-up) = 36.55) differed with respect to offense characteristics (e.g., sexually assaulting familial victims) and recidivistic outcomes. Although both groups sexually reoffended at roughly the same rate (14.3% vs. 9.9%), consistent with their typology, significantly more of the generalists reoffended violently (18.2% vs. 1.4%), sexually and/or violently (27.3% vs. 11.3%), nonviolently (37.7% vs. 16.9%), and engaged in any further criminal behaviors (45.5% vs. 23.9%) during follow-up. Adjusting for total number of offenses and age at first sexual offense, Cox regression analyses showed that generalists were significantly more likely than specialists to reoffend violently (hazard ratio = 9.31; 95% confidence interval = 1.15-76.39). The differences between generalists and specialists suggest a valid typological distinction with a higher risk trajectory for the generalists. These findings therefore have important clinical implications for assessment, management, and intervention planning for adolescent sexual offenders.