Open AccessContinual Permutations of Misunderstanding: The Curious Incidents of the Grounded Theory Method
Author(s) -
Antony Bryant
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
qualitative inquiry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1552-7565
pISSN - 1077-8004
DOI - 10.1177/1077800420920663
Subject(s) - grounded theory , epistemology , judgement , criticism , key (lock) , sociology , qualitative research , psychology , law , philosophy , social science , computer science , political science , computer security
This article draws attention to the ways in which Grounded Theory Method (GTM) continues to be a target of criticism, misunderstanding, and ill-judgement more than 50 years after its first appearance. This disparagement originates in part from some key paradoxes in the method itself. Yet this is insignificant in contrast to the continuing antagonism emanating from outside the method, indicating critical limitations in the practices of the gatekeepers of the academic world. GTM seems to be the target of continual permutations of misunderstanding, and it is these that I wish to address, and I hope, dispel in what follows.