z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Misclassification of Medicaid Participation by Dual Eligibles: Evidence From the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey
Author(s) -
Jennifer M. Mellor,
Melissa McInerney,
Lindsay M. Sabik
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
medical care research and review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.433
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1552-6801
pISSN - 1077-5587
DOI - 10.1177/1077558719858839
Subject(s) - medicaid , beneficiary , dual (grammatical number) , medicine , medicare part b , actuarial science , business , economic growth , economics , health care , finance , payment , art , literature
Previous studies show that survey-based reports of Medicaid participation are measured with error, but no prior study has examined measurement error in an important segment of the Medicaid population-low-income adults enrolled in Medicare. Using the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, we examine whether respondent self-reports of Medicaid enrollment match administrative records and present several key findings. First, among low-income Medicare beneficiaries, the false negative rate is 11.5% when the self-report is interpreted as full Medicaid and 3.7% when the self-report is interpreted as full or partial Medicaid. Second, the likelihood of a false negative report is systematically associated with respondent traits. Third, systematic measurement error results in biased coefficient estimates in models of Medicaid participation defined from self-reports, and the bias is more significant when the researcher interprets self-reports as full Medicaid coverage only. Researchers should use caution when interpreting survey reports as pertaining to full Medicaid coverage only.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here