z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Inclusivity and Decentralisation of Candidate Selectorates: Factional Consequences for Centre-Left Parties in England, Germany, and the United States
Author(s) -
Mike Cowburn,
Rebecca Kerr
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
political research quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1938-274X
pISSN - 1065-9129
DOI - 10.1177/10659129221081213
Subject(s) - legislature , political science , decentralization , allegiance , democracy , public administration , incentive , political economy , politics , law , sociology , economics , market economy
In recent elections, ‘progressives’ in centre-left parties have advocated for more democratised processes of candidate selection. We test whether more inclusive and decentralised selectorates align with higher numbers of progressive candidates nominated in national legislative elections by centre-left parties across three advanced western democracies between 2017 and 2021. In the Labour Party, more centralised selectorates aligned with higher numbers of progressives selected. For the SPD, we report null findings, likely due to additional incentives for factional co-operation in a multi-party system. In our most decentralised case, the Democratic Party, selection of progressives was congruent with district partisanship rather than selectorate inclusivity, with progressives more commonly selected in safe rather than competitive or unfavoured districts. This relationship was not present in our other cases. These findings highlight the importance of the decentralisation dimension for the factional allegiance of legislative candidates nominated.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom