Premium
Interobserver Agreement in Magnetic Resonance Brain and Neck Imaging
Author(s) -
Colledge Nicki,
Sellar Robin,
Wardlaw Joanna,
Lewis Susan,
Mead Gillian,
Wilson Janet
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of neuroimaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1552-6569
pISSN - 1051-2284
DOI - 10.1177/1051228405001479
Subject(s) - medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , nuclear medicine , nuclear magnetic resonance , radiology , physics
Aim . To investigate the interobserver reliability of brain and neck magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in older community subjects previously recruited to a case‐control study of dizziness. Methods. Subjects aged over 65 years were identified through a local survey and advertising. Several investigations were performed, including MRI of the head and neck using a Siemens 1.5 Tesla machine. Images were coded independently by two consultant neuroradiologists. Interobserver agreement was calculated using kappa statistics. Results . Of the 246 participants, scans from 84 dizzy subjects and 79 non‐dizzy subjects were available for coding by two neuroradiologists. Agreement was “fair” for cerebral atrophy, “good” for white matter lesions (WML) in the cerebral hemispheres, and moderate for WML in the posterior fossa. Agreement for cervical spine disease ranged from “moderate” (severity of cord compression) to “poor” (vertebral artery occlusion). Conclusion . Interobserver variability in the evaluation of brain and cervical cord MRI was substantial. The development of standardized scores, particularly for disease of the cervical cord, may improve interobserver reliability.