z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Analytical performance and method comparison of a quantitative point-of-care immunoassay for measurement of bile acids in cats and dogs
Author(s) -
Kristina Weiler,
Katharina Kleber,
Sabine Zielinsky,
Andreas Moritz,
Natali Bauer
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.529
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1943-4936
pISSN - 1040-6387
DOI - 10.1177/1040638720968784
Subject(s) - cats , chromatography , bilirubin , reference range , detection limit , spectrum analyzer , chemistry , coefficient of variation , limits of agreement , point of care , nuclear medicine , medicine , pathology , electrical engineering , engineering
Point-of-care analyzers (POCAs) for quantitative assessment of bile acids (BAs) are scarce in veterinary medicine. We evaluated the Fuji Dri-Chem Immuno AU10V analyzer and v-BA test kit (Fujifilm) for detection of feline and canine total serum BA concentration. Results were compared with a 5th-generation assay as reference method and a 3rd-generation assay, both run on a bench-top analyzer. Analytical performance was assessed at 3 different concentration ranges, and with interferences. For method comparison, samples of 60 healthy and diseased cats and 64 dogs were included. Linearity was demonstrated for a BA concentration up to 130 µmol/L in cats ( r = 0.99) and 110 µmol/L in dogs ( r = 0.99). The analyzer showed high precision near the lower limit of quantification of 2 µmol/L reported by the manufacturer. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were < 5% for both species and all concentrations. Interferences were observed for bilirubin (800 mg/L) and lipid (4 g/L). There was excellent correlation with the reference method for feline ( r s = 0.98) and canine samples ( r s = 0.97), with proportional biases of 6.7% and -1.3%, respectively. However, a large bias (44.1%) was noted when the POCA was compared to the 3rd-generation assay. Total observed error was less than total allowable error at the 3 concentrations. The POCA reliably detected feline and canine BA in clinically relevant concentrations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here