Premium
Dual commitment in the Australian construction industry
Author(s) -
Leveson Lynne,
Joiner Therese,
Bakalis Steve
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
asia pacific journal of human resources
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.825
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1744-7941
pISSN - 1038-4111
DOI - 10.1177/1038411110378957
Subject(s) - agency (philosophy) , loyalty , context (archaeology) , organizational commitment , perception , human resource management , business , dual (grammatical number) , diversity (politics) , work (physics) , public relations , temporary work , social psychology , psychology , marketing , sociology , management , political science , economics , biology , mechanical engineering , paleontology , social science , art , literature , neuroscience , anthropology , engineering
The rapid growth in the size and nature of ‘non‐standard’ work arrangements (such as co‐employment) has raised questions about their effect on the commitment and loyalty of the workers concerned. While maintaining and encouraging employee commitment is a core human resource management function in standard work arrangements, there is far less guidance available for equivalent practice within a non‐standard context. Additionally, it remains unclear as to whether organisational behaviour theories used to explain commitment in the standard work context are generalisable to less traditional work settings. The study described here measured the commitment and perceived support (organisational and social) of labour‐hire workers in the Australian construction industry to their employing agency and their current host firm. Also investigated was the relationship between these forms of support and affective commitment to both entities. The results indicate that the workers were committed to both entities although their commitment to and their perceptions of organisational and social support from the employing agency was higher. Further, we found a positive association between employing agency affective commitment and both forms of perceived support and a positive association between host affective commitment and perceived host organisational support. These results affirm the existence of dual commitment and highlight the role that positive perceptions of support play in engendering this commitment. While the findings indicate that conventional organisational theories are relevant to human resource management practices in co‐employment relationships, it is suggested that such practices must account for the great diversity of contexts, employees and employment arrangements that characterise these relationships.