z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Limitations of current treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus: a patient and physician survey
Author(s) -
Vibeke Strand,
C. Galateanu,
D.S. Pushparajah,
Enkeleida Nikaï,
Jennifer Sayers,
Robert Wood,
R. van Vollenhoven
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
lupus
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.069
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1477-0962
pISSN - 0961-2033
DOI - 10.1177/0961203313492577
Subject(s) - medicine , quality of life (healthcare) , work productivity , disease , physical therapy , productivity , nursing , economics , macroeconomics
An independent cross-sectional survey assessed systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease and treatment burden. Variables included medication classes prescribed, disease activity, flare occurrences, treatment satisfaction, and validated measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), fatigue and work productivity. Of 886 eligible patients (mean age 41.3 years, 89% female), 515 completed the survey. One-third reported moderate-to-severe disease activity, and 31% had flared in the last 12 months. Higher severity of disease activity (moderate-to-severe) was associated with ≥2 medication classes prescribed and treatment regimens that included corticosteroids (CS) (both p < 0.0001). Patients receiving CS reported lower EQ-5D scores ( p = 0.0019) and higher fatigue levels ( p < 0.001), and both patients ( p = 0.0019) and physicians ( p = 0.0001) were less likely to report satisfaction with treatment regimens including CS. Among responders eligible for work ( n = 456), severity of disease activity (moderate-to-severe vs. mild) was associated with unemployment (52.9% vs. 40.8%; p = 0.0189), greater impairment in work productivity (36% vs. 21%; p = 0.0003) and participation in daily activities (41% vs. 21%; p < 0.0001). This survey confirms that SLE and current treatment options substantially impair patients' health status and work productivity. Physician- and patient-reported satisfaction with current treatment regimens, despite poorly controlled disease activity, indicate they are resigned to the limitations of available SLE treatment regimens.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here