Open AccessWho should apologise: Expressing criticism of public figures on Chinese social media in times of COVID-19
Author(s) -
Yingnian Tao
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
discourse and society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.651
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1460-3624
pISSN - 0957-9265
DOI - 10.1177/09579265211013116
Subject(s) - censorship , rhetorical question , politics , public sphere , media studies , sociology , opposition (politics) , public opinion , context (archaeology) , criticism , discourse analysis , framing (construction) , frame analysis , social media , blame , public discourse , political science , law , content analysis , social science , history , linguistics , social psychology , philosophy , psychology , archaeology
Previous studies on public opinion expression in communication, political science and discourse analysis are restricted to a censorship-/counter-censorship frame and focus their analysis on events with political agendas. This study explores netizens’ discursive practice by focusing the analysis on netizens’ language use in context per se, rather than from a censorship/counter-censorship viewpoint. It adopts a discursive pragmatic approach to examine a ‘mundane’ trending topic regarding a dispute between two public figures rather than ‘major’ events with acute social and political agendas. This study present evidence that Weibo users criticise public figures through indirect discursive strategies, including parody of name, constructed dialogues and rhetorical questions. It also highlights two prominent sentiments in Weibo public spheres during the COVID-19 pandemic – cyber nationalism and binary opposition between China and the rest of the world. The online backlash against Fang demonstrates how easily netizens can change their views towards a certain event.