z-logo
Premium
Energy Expenditure in Acute Posttraumatic Amputation
Author(s) -
Robins Kathleen,
Stankorb Susan M.,
Salgueiro Marybeth
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
nutrition in clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.725
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1941-2452
pISSN - 0884-5336
DOI - 10.1177/0884533613507605
Subject(s) - cart , medicine , amputation , gold standard (test) , resting energy expenditure , population , energy expenditure , surgery , mechanical engineering , environmental health , engineering
Background : Adequate energy intake is a component of successful recovery after injury, yet little is known about the energy requirements in the acute period following traumatic amputation. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical applicability of resting energy expenditure (REE) measured by a handheld calorimeter and estimated by 3 different predictive equations to that measured by the gold standard, indirect calorimetry using a metabolic cart, during the acute postamputation period of inpatient hospitalization. Materials and Methods : Indirect calorimetry measured using both a metabolic cart and handheld calorimeter and predicted by 3 equations were used to assess energy needs of eligible subjects admitted to Brooke Army Medical Center with traumatic amputation(s). REE measured by the handheld calorimeter and estimated using 3 predictive equations (Mifflin St. Jeor, Ireton‐Jones 1992, and the American College of Chest Physicians [ACCP]) were compared to the gold standard metabolic cart. Each measure was assessed for significant differences and level of clinical acceptability defined as ± 10% REE by metabolic cart. Results : Thirteen male service members with traumatic amputation(s) were included. The majority of subject's measurements using the handheld calorimeter (n = 9, 69%) and 3 predictive equations (Mifflin St. Jeor [n = 7, 54%], Ireton‐Jones 1992 [n = 8, 62%], ACCP [n = 7, 54%]) fell outside of the ± 10% range of clinical acceptability. Conclusion : Use of the metabolic cart for measuring energy needs remains optimal in this population.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here