z-logo
Premium
Parent‐Reported Effects of Gastrostomy Tube Placement
Author(s) -
Åvitsland Tone Lise,
Birketvedt Kjersti,
Bjørnland Kristin,
Emblem Ragnhild
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
nutrition in clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.725
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1941-2452
pISSN - 0884-5336
DOI - 10.1177/0884533613486484
Subject(s) - medicine , gastrostomy tube , gastrostomy , tube (container) , feeding tube , surgery , waste management , engineering
Background : For children with major feeding problems and their parents, meals may be unpleasant. We aimed to evaluate how insertion of a gastrostomy tube influenced parent‐child communication and satisfaction during meals, as well as duration of meals, oral intake, vomiting, and growth. Materials and Methods : Children admitted for a gastrostomy tube placement were included. Age, sex, diagnosis, and preoperative nasogastric tube were registered. Weight, height, oral feeding, duration of meals, and vomiting were assessed preoperatively and 6 and 18 months postoperatively. We used a numeric rating scale to assess parent‐reported parental stress, child satisfaction, parent satisfaction, and parent‐child communication during meals at all 3 time points. Results: Fifty‐eight children were included: 33 boys and 25 girls. Median age was 1.7 years (range, 0.5–14.7 years). Thirty‐nine were neurologically impaired, and 44 had a nasogastric tube for a median of 7.5 months (range, 0.5–28 months) preoperatively. Child satisfaction ( P = .001), parent satisfaction ( P = .006), and parent‐child communication ( P = .026) during meals were significantly improved 18 months after receiving a gastrostomy tube. Vomiting was reduced in 42%, oral intake increased in 49%, and weight‐for‐height percentile increased in 55% of the children. Conclusions : In children with major feeding problems, a gastrostomy tube improved parent‐child communication and satisfaction during meals. Furthermore, oral intake was increased, and vomiting was reduced. Growth improved in around half of the children.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here