z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Quantitative methods I: The world we have lost – or where we started from
Author(s) -
Johnston Ron,
Harris Richard,
Jones Kelvyn,
Manley David,
Wang Wenfei Winnie,
Wolf Levi
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
progress in human geography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.283
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1477-0288
pISSN - 0309-1325
DOI - 10.1177/0309132518774967
Subject(s) - quantitative analysis (chemistry) , discipline , epistemology , focus (optics) , positivism , order (exchange) , human geography , sociology , geography , regional science , social science , philosophy , chemistry , physics , chromatography , finance , optics , economics
Although pioneering studies using statistical methods in geographical data analysis were published in the 1930s, it was only in the 1960s that their increasing use in human geography led to a claim that a ‘quantitative revolution’ had taken place. The widespread use of quantitative methods from then on was associated with changes in both disciplinary philosophy and substantive focus. The first decades of the ‘revolution’ saw quantitative analyses focused on the search for spatial order of a geometric form within an, often implicit, logical positivist framework. In the first of three reviews of the use of quantitative methods in human geography, this progress report uncovers their origin with regard to the underlying philosophy, the focus on spatial order, and the nature of the methods deployed. Subsequent reports will outline the changes in all three that occurred in later decades and will chart the contemporary situation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom