z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative analysis of a complement fixation assay and enzyme immunoassay to determine the seroprevalence of measles and varicella in a survey of healthcare workers
Author(s) -
Hiroshi Shibata,
Shunichi Kumakura,
Takeshi Isobe,
Masahiro Hirose,
Miki Ohe,
Nobuhiro Nishimura,
Keiichi Onoda,
Atsushi Nagai,
Shûhei Yamaguchi
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of international medical research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.421
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1473-2300
pISSN - 0300-0605
DOI - 10.1177/0300060512474773
Subject(s) - seroprevalence , medicine , complement fixation test , measles , immunoassay , chickenpox , antibody , health care , immunology , measles virus , virology , serology , vaccination , virus , economics , economic growth
Objective Seroprevalence surveys of healthcare workers for vaccine-preventable diseases, including measles and varicella, are essential for disease prevention and infection control programmes. The purpose of this study was to compare the complement fixation (CF) assay and an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to determine the prevalence of immunoglobulin G antibodies directed against measles and varicella viruses in healthcare workers. Methods Antimeasles and antivaricella antibody titres were measured simultaneously in serum samples from healthcare workers employed at a Japanese university hospital, using the CF assay and an EIA. Results Serum samples were obtained from 898 healthcare workers. Seropositivity rates determined using the CF assay and EIA were 67.8% versus 94.0%, respectively, for measles, and 83.2% versus 97.6% for varicella. Compared with EIA, a nine- and 22-fold higher number of seronegative subjects was identified by the CF assay for measles and varicella, respectively. Conclusion Differences between the CF assay and EIA in detecting seronegative or seropositive healthcare workers for measles and varicella suggest that undertaking a seroprevalence survey using an EIA, rather than a CF assay, would more accurately determine susceptibility to vaccine-preventable diseases, in healthcare settings.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here