z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Adaptive Policies to Balance Health Benefits and Economic Costs of Physical Distancing Interventions during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Author(s) -
Reza Yaesoubi,
Joshua Havumaki,
Melanie H. Chitwood,
Nicolas A. Menzies,
Gregg Gonsalves,
Joshua A. Salomon,
A. David Paltiel,
Ted Cohen
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
medical decision making
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.393
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1552-681X
pISSN - 0272-989X
DOI - 10.1177/0272989x21990371
Subject(s) - psychological intervention , social distance , distancing , pandemic , covid-19 , risk analysis (engineering) , public economics , h1n1 pandemic , balance (ability) , computer science , business , actuarial science , economics , medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation , nursing , disease , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Policy makers need decision tools to determine when to use physical distancing interventions to maximize the control of COVID-19 while minimizing the economic and social costs of these interventions. We describe a pragmatic decision tool to characterize adaptive policies that combine real-time surveillance data with clear decision rules to guide when to trigger, continue, or stop physical distancing interventions during the current pandemic. In model-based experiments, we find that adaptive policies characterized by our proposed approach prevent more deaths and require a shorter overall duration of physical distancing than alternative physical distancing policies. Our proposed approach can readily be extended to more complex models and interventions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom