A methodological evaluation of the published consensus statements, recommendations and guidelines about surgical management in the course of coronavirus disease pandemic | Zendy

Luca Bertolaccini | Zendy; Giorgio Lo Iacono | Zendy; Antonio Mazzella | Zendy; Elena Prisciandaro | Zendy; Giulia Sedda | Zendy; Lorenzo Spaggiari | Zendy

Open Access

A methodological evaluation of the published consensus statements, recommendations and guidelines about surgical management in the course of coronavirus disease pandemic

Author(s) -

Luca Bertolaccini,

Giorgio Lo Iacono,

Antonio Mazzella,

Elena Prisciandaro,

Giulia Sedda,

Lorenzo Spaggiari

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

asian cardiovascular and thoracic annals

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.203

H-Index - 27

eISSN - 1816-5370

pISSN - 0218-4923

DOI - 10.1177/0218492320980937

Subject(s) - pandemic , guideline , clarity , medicine , critical appraisal , medline , medical education , best practice , disease management , covid-19 , political science , disease , alternative medicine , health management system , pathology , biochemistry , chemistry , infectious disease (medical specialty) , law

A project to benchmark the consensus statements, guidelines, and recommendations on surgical management in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic was developed to assess the methodology used. Standard and practical approaches for COVID-19 management in surgical patients to date are not accessible, despite the magnitude of the pandemic. A plethora of consensus statements, guidelines, and recommendations on surgical management in the course of COVID-19 epidemic have been rapidly published in the last three months.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research