z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Carl Schmitt’s two concepts of humanity
Author(s) -
Matthias Lievens
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
philosophy and social criticism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.316
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1461-734X
pISSN - 0191-4537
DOI - 10.1177/0191453710375591
Subject(s) - humanity , absolute (philosophy) , epistemology , philosophy , humanism , interpretation (philosophy) , politics , normative , plea , trace (psycholinguistics) , sociology , law , theology , political science , linguistics
A dominant interpretation of Carl Schmitt’s work depicts him as a theologically inspired and anti-humanist thinker. This paper argues, however, that his concept of the political, founded on a plea for relative instead of absolute enmity, takes Schmitt away from theology onto a profane level, where enemies recognize each other as human beings. Although Schmitt states that he who uses the concept of humanity wants to betray, one can trace in his work a distinction between two concepts of humanity which gives a philosophical foundation for the distinction between relative and absolute enmity, and thus, for the political. It is at the basis of a minimally normative understanding of the political which can be of great interest for contemporary debates on the contemporary world order.status: publishe

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom