Carl Schmitt’s two concepts of humanity
Author(s) -
Matthias Lievens
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
philosophy and social criticism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.316
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1461-734X
pISSN - 0191-4537
DOI - 10.1177/0191453710375591
Subject(s) - humanity , absolute (philosophy) , epistemology , philosophy , humanism , interpretation (philosophy) , politics , normative , plea , trace (psycholinguistics) , sociology , law , theology , political science , linguistics
A dominant interpretation of Carl Schmitt’s work depicts him as a theologically inspired and anti-humanist thinker. This paper argues, however, that his concept of the political, founded on a plea for relative instead of absolute enmity, takes Schmitt away from theology onto a profane level, where enemies recognize each other as human beings. Although Schmitt states that he who uses the concept of humanity wants to betray, one can trace in his work a distinction between two concepts of humanity which gives a philosophical foundation for the distinction between relative and absolute enmity, and thus, for the political. It is at the basis of a minimally normative understanding of the political which can be of great interest for contemporary debates on the contemporary world order.status: publishe
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom