z-logo
Premium
Retrograde (Ascending) Bacterial Contamination of Enteral Diet Administration Systems
Author(s) -
PayneJames J. Jason,
Rana S.K.,
Bray M.J.,
Mcswiggan David A.,
Silk David B.A.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.935
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1941-2444
pISSN - 0148-6071
DOI - 10.1177/0148607192016004369
Subject(s) - enteral administration , contamination , parenteral nutrition , medicine , administration (probate law) , intensive care medicine , gastroenterology , biology , ecology , political science , law
A prospective clinical study in three phases was performed to determine whether it was possible that enteral diet containers could become contaminated as a result of endogenous organisms ascending retrogradely from the enteral feeding tube via the giving set, and if this did occur whether the incidence could be altered by modifying enteral delivery systems. Each phase observed patients on enteral feeding over a 48‐hour study period (phase I, n = 18; phase II, n = 17; phase III, n = 18). Each patient was prescribed an enteral diet of 2 L/24 h administered by continuous pump infusion from a closed 1‐L sterile diet container. Four containers were used for each patient, and one giving set was used in the 48‐hour period. Diet samples were taken at 12‐hour intervals: two from the giving set before and after flushing with residual diet, and one from the diet container. Phases differed only in the design of the giving set: phase I had no drip chamber, phase II had a drip chamber, phase III had a drip chamber and an anti‐reflux ball valve at the distal end. Both phase I and III had greater numbers of giving set samples colonized at 24, 36, and 48 hours. In phase I, 3 of 14 sterile diet containers were colonized with >10 4 colony‐forming organisms/mL of diet at 48 hours. Only phase II had no organisms contaminating the containers at 48 hours. We conclude that the retrograde spread of organisms from patient to sterile diet container does occur in clinical practice, and that a drip chamber in the giving set may prevent the problem. However, including a ball valve at the distal end of a giving set with a drip chamber negates this beneficial effect. These results have important implications when administering enteral nutrition to high‐risk patient groups.( Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 16: 369–373, 1992)

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here