Premium
Preoperative Parenteral Nutrition in the High Risk Surgical Patient
Author(s) -
Bellantone R.,
Doglietto G.B.,
Bossola M.,
Pacelli F.,
Negro F.,
Sofo L.,
Crucitti F.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.935
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1941-2444
pISSN - 0148-6071
DOI - 10.1177/0148607188012002195
Subject(s) - medicine , sepsis , parenteral nutrition , complication , incidence (geometry) , surgery , gastrectomy , malnutrition , randomized controlled trial , systemic inflammatory response syndrome , gastroenterology , cancer , physics , optics
In order to assess the significance of malnutrition in determining surgical complications and the possibility of their reduction by preoperative nutritional support (PNS), a randomized controlled trial is being performed at our institution. The results relative to 100 patients who underwent major surgery for gastrointestinal disease, are presented here. In the treatment group 49 patients received 30 kcal/kg/day and 200 mg/kg/day of nitrogen for at least 7 days in the immediate preoperative period (nine patients were excluded from this group due to early surgery—seven cases; or refusal to accept PNS—two cases. Data analysis with their inclusion or exclusion showed similar results.) Fifty‐one patients constituted the control group. The observed septic complication rate was, respectively, 30 and 35.3% ( p :NS). When the analysis was restricted to the patients with abnormal instant nutritional assessment (INA), as defined by Seltzer et al (serum albumin <3.5 g/dl and/or total lymphocyte count <1500 cells/mm 3 ), a statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of sepsis between the two subgroups (21% vs 53.3%, p < 0.05). Analogous results were obtained from the patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer: 16.7% of septic complications in the malnourished treated patients and 100% in the malnourished control ones ( p < 0.05). The occurrence of serious sepsis (sepsis score ≥ 10, according to the scoring system developed by Elebute and Stoner) in the malnourished subgroups was 5.2% and 26.7%, respectively, ( p = 0.09). The postoperative mortality rate was not significantly changed by the PNS (reduction from 3.9% to 2.5%, p :NS). This result was expected since power analysis indicates a too large number of patients would be needed to show a statistically significant difference in this low mortality risk category of patients. Our study suggests that malnourished patients waiting for major gastrointestinal surgery may benefit from an adequate PNS that seems to significantly reduce septic complication rate. ( Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 12: 195–197, 1988)