Premium
Effect of Critical Illness on Triglyceride Absorption
Author(s) -
Ali Abdelhamid Yasmine,
Cousins Caroline E.,
Sim Jennifer A.,
Bellon Max S.,
Nguyen Nam Q.,
Horowitz Michael,
Chapman Marianne J.,
Deane Adam M.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.935
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1941-2444
pISSN - 0148-6071
DOI - 10.1177/0148607114540214
Subject(s) - parenteral nutrition , absorption (acoustics) , critically ill , triglyceride , critical illness , duodenum , medicine , enteral administration , triolein , gastroenterology , chemistry , biochemistry , cholesterol , materials science , lipase , enzyme , composite material
Background : Adequate nutrition support for critically ill patients optimizes outcome, and enteral feeding is the preferred route of nutrition. Small intestinal glucose absorption is frequently impaired in critical illness. Despite lipid being a major constituent of liquid nutrient administered, there is little information about lipid absorption during critical illness. Objectives : To determine small intestinal lipid, as well as glucose, absorption in critical illness compared with health. Materials and Methods : Twenty‐nine mechanically ventilated critically ill patients and 16 healthy volunteers were studied. Liquid nutrient (60 mL, 1 kcal/mL), containing 200 µL 13 C‐triolein and 3 g 3‐O‐methyl‐glucose (3‐OMG), was infused directly into the duodenum at a rate of 2 kcal/min. Exhaled 13 CO 2 and serum 3‐OMG concentrations were measured at timed intervals over 360 minutes. Lipid absorption was measured as the cumulative percentage dose (cPDR) of 13 CO 2 recovered at 360 minutes. Glucose absorption was measured as the area under the 3‐OMG concentration curve. Data are median (range) and analyzed using the Mann‐Whitney U and Pearson correlation tests. Results : Lipid absorption was markedly less in the critically ill (cPDR 13 CO 2 : patients, 22.6% [0%–100%] vs healthy participants, 40.7% [5.3%–84.7%]; P = .018). While glucose absorption was less at 60 minutes in the critically ill (3‐OMG 60 : 13.2 [3.5–29.5] vs 21.1 [9.3–31.9] mmol/L·min; P = .003), this was not apparent at 360 minutes (3‐OMG 360 : 92.7 [54.5–147.9] vs 107.9 [64.0–168.7] mmol/L·min; P = .126). There was no relationship between lipid and glucose absorption. Conclusion : Small intestinal absorption of lipid is diminished during critical illness.