Premium
Telehealth Videoconferencing: Improving Home Parenteral Nutrition Patient Care to Rural Areas of Ontario, Canada
Author(s) -
Saqui Olivia,
Chang Albert,
McGonigle Sharon,
Purdy Brendan,
Fairholm Lydia,
Baun Mary,
Yeung Millie,
Rossos Peter,
Allard Johane
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.935
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1941-2444
pISSN - 0148-6071
DOI - 10.1177/0148607107031003234
Subject(s) - telehealth , medicine , videoconferencing , telemedicine , health care , patient satisfaction , nursing , family medicine , medical emergency , multimedia , computer science , economics , economic growth
Background: Telehealth videoconferencing is a medium for health care professionals to communicate and care for patients living in remote areas. The aim of this study was to provide a survey to examine management outcome of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) patients when followed by telehealth as an alternative modality of care. Methods: Twenty‐six individuals who were identified to benefit from tele‐health were invited to participate in a satisfaction survey. The survey was sent to patients by postal mail. The survey also documented the incidence of line sepsis and other medical HPN complications. A cost analysis was also performed according to technology, human resources, and infrastructure. Results: Eighty‐one telehealth videoconference sessions have been held since the inception of telehealth in 2002. Of the current telehealth patients, 13 were eligible for the survey. The satisfaction survey response rate was 11/13 (84.6%). The average line sepsis rate for the 13 patients was 0.89/1000 catheter‐days. All patients were generally satisfied with videoconferencing as an alternative method of communication and care for new consultation, patient and family education, and follow‐up. Travel time and costs to the patients, their families, and the health care system were significantly less. For example, a patient who resides 611 km from Toronto would cost CDN (Canadian) $724.00 for flight and accommodation to meet with the team at the HPN clinic in Toronto. Conclusion: Telehealth incorporated the cost‐saving ability for HPN patients to maintain proper medical care, support, and collaboration of specialists inaccessible to their local community. Thus, its strongly positive role in HPN care deserves further consideration for a national application.