Premium
Implementing Feeding Guidelines for NICU Patients <2000 g Results in Less Variability in Nutrition Outcomes
Author(s) -
Street Jennifer L.,
Montgomery Dianne,
Alder Stephen C.,
Lambert Diane K.,
Gerstmann Dale R.,
Christensen Robert D.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.935
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1941-2444
pISSN - 0148-6071
DOI - 10.1177/0148607106030006515
Subject(s) - medicine , parenteral nutrition , pediatrics , enteral administration , neonatal intensive care unit , target range , intensive care , intensive care medicine , economics , macroeconomics
Background: We devised a consistent approach to instituting and advancing enteral nutrition among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients<2000 g birth weight. We then assessed variability in feeding‐related outcomes during a period before (period 1) vs after (period 2) implementing these guidelines. Methods: Using data from period 1 vs period 2, we statistically compared the equivalence of variance, focusing on certain feeding‐related outcomes. Specific outcomes we chose to examine were (1) day of life when the first enteral feedings were given, (2) number of days during the entire hospitalization when no feedings were given, (3) number of days parenteral nutrition (PN) was administered, and (4) day of life when feedings of 80 mL/k/d and 100 kcal/k/d enteral were achieved. Results: Fifty‐eight patients <2000 g were admitted to the NICU in period 1, of which 56 survived to discharge home. In period 2, 68 patients<2000 g were admitted and 66 survived to discharge. Demographic features of the patients in periods 1 and 2 did not differ. In both periods, feedings were begun on a median of day 1. However, in period 1 the range was from day 0 to day 24, and in period 2, the range was from day 0 to day 6 (equivalence of variance p < .001). After feedings were initiated, they were withheld for a median of 2 days (range, 0–23) during the remainder of the hospitalization in period 1 vs a median of 1 day (range, 0–12) in period 2 ( p < .001). During period 1, PN was used for a median of 10 days (range, 0–72) vs 7 (range, 0–47) in period 2 ( p = .001). During period 1, more variability occurred in the day of life when 80 mL/k/d and 100 kcal/k/d were achieved (both p < .001). No differences were seen in necrotizing enterocolitis, intestinal perforation, mortality, or length of hospital stay. Conclusions: Implementing feeding guidelines was associated with significantly less variability in feeding‐related outcomes. We speculate that this is a reflection of better feeding tolerance, which resulted from a more consistent approach to initiating and advancing enteral feedings.