Premium
Outcomes in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Before and After the Implementation of a Nutrition Support Team
Author(s) -
Gurgueira Gisele Limongeli,
Leite Heitor Pons,
Aguiar Carrazedo Taddei José Augusto,
Carvalho Werther Brunow
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.935
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1941-2444
pISSN - 0148-6071
DOI - 10.1177/0148607105029003176
Subject(s) - medicine , parenteral nutrition , odds ratio , confidence interval , pediatric intensive care unit , mechanical ventilation , mortality rate , malnutrition , pediatrics , medical nutrition therapy , emergency medicine
Background: We evaluated the effect of parenteral nutrition (PN) and enteral nutrition (EN) on in–pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) mortality before and after a continuous education program in nutrition support that leads to implementation of a nutrition support team (NST). Methods: We used a historical cohort study of infants hospitalized for >72 hours at the PICU from 1992 to 2003. Five periods were selected (P1 to P5), considering the modifications incorporated into the program: P1, without intervention; P2, basic themes and original articles discussion; P3, clinical and nursing staff participation; P4, clinical visits; P5, NST. The samples were compared in terms of sex, age, admitting service (ie, medical vs surgical), prognostic index of mortality, length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation, in‐PICU mortality rate, and percentage of time receiving EN and PN for each patient. Bi‐ and multivariate analyses were performed. Statistical significance was set at 0.05 level. Results: Progressive increase was observed in EN use ( p = .0001), median values for which were 25% in P1 and rose to 67% by P5 in medical patients; there was no significant difference in surgical patients. A reduction was observed in PN use; in P1 medians were 73% and 69% for medical and surgical patients respectively, and decreased to 0% in P5 for both groups ( p = .0001). There was significant reduction in‐PICU mortality rate during P4 and P5 among medical patients ( p < .001). The risk of death was 83% lower in patients that received EN for >50% of LOS (odds ratio, 0.17; confidence interval, 0.066–0.412; p = .000). Conclusions: The program motivated an increase in EN and a decrease in PN use, mainly after implementation of NST and reduced in‐PICU mortality rate.