Premium
A Nationwide Survey of Long‐Term Care Facilities to Determine the Characteristics of Medication Administration through Enteral Feeding Catheters
Author(s) -
Seifert Charles F.,
Johnston Barbara A.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
nutrition in clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.725
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1941-2452
pISSN - 0884-5336
DOI - 10.1177/0115426505020003354
Subject(s) - medicine , population , nursing homes , incidence (geometry) , enteral administration , administration (probate law) , long term care , emergency medicine , parenteral nutrition , pediatrics , intensive care medicine , environmental health , nursing , physics , political science , law , optics
Previous data clearly showed profound differences in nursing practices and techniques within the state of Texas regarding the administration of medications through enteral feeding catheters (EFCs) between long‐term care (LTC) facilities that predominantly serve a rural vs an urban population. This study aims to determine the incidence and characteristics of medication administration through EFCs in the LTC setting in the United States with particular emphasis on the delineation between practices in facilities that predominantly serve a rural vs an urban population. A 36‐item validated survey was mailed to the Directors of Nursing of the 16,400 LTC facilities registered with the U.S. Medicare LTC facility database registry. In all, 1278 (7.8%) surveys were included in this analysis. The majority of nurses responding were RNs (93%), with extensive years of experience (19 years), working in facilities predominantly serving a rural area (58%). There were significant differences between rural and urban facilities with regard to the percent of patients receiving medications through EFCs (6.6% vs 9.0%, p < .0001), number of oral medications/day (8.3 vs 9.4, p = .0003), amount of flush before and after administering medications (64 mL vs 59 mL, p = .0127), those attending a seminar/in‐service on medication administration through EFCs (45% vs 56%, p < .0001), and medication obstruction rate (6.4% vs 3.9%, p = .0227). Medication obstruction rate was significantly increased when nurses used 3 or more inappropriate techniques (8.1% vs 4.8%, p = .0171), particularly crushing enteric‐coated (8.9% vs 4.6%, p = .0003) and sustained‐release dosage forms (8.5% vs 4.7%, p < .0001). Medication obstruction through EFCs is significantly increased when 3 or more inappropriate techniques are utilized. Techniques, complications, and sources of information vary significantly from rural to urban facilities and various parts of the country. A universal set of guidelines to administer medications through EFCs should be adopted and widely disseminated particularly to LTC facilities in rural areas.