Bringing the State Back into the Sociology of Nationalism: ThePersona FictaIs Political
Author(s) -
Charles LeddyOwen
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.847
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1469-8684
pISSN - 0038-0385
DOI - 10.1177/0038038520925730
Subject(s) - nationalism , sociology , politics , agency (philosophy) , argument (complex analysis) , salience (neuroscience) , state (computer science) , epistemology , social science , law , political science , philosophy , algorithm , computer science , psychology , biochemistry , chemistry , cognitive psychology
This article re-examines two key questions from the sociology of nationalism – why nationalism resonates emotionally and to what extent nations are socially salient – and the implications of these for a sense of peoplehood and collective political agency. The particular focus is on the state. Instead of conflating statehood with nationhood, or seeking to expose it as illusory, sociologists should consider how the state – imagined and experienced as a permanent, trans-historical fixture structuring public power and authority – has crucial conditioning effects on society and politics. It will be posited that statehood is a more useful concept than nationhood for explaining the resonance and salience ascribed to nationalism and nations. Whether we favour reinvigorating or abolishing nationalism, the implications of this argument are profound, with contemporary cosmopolitan sociology in particular suffering analytically and prescriptively from a failure to recognise its tacit methodological statism.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom