Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation
Author(s) -
Matthew Williams,
Pete Burnap,
Luke Sloan
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.847
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1469-8684
pISSN - 0038-0385
DOI - 10.1177/0038038517708140
Subject(s) - publishing , sociology , context (archaeology) , internet privacy , estimation , big data , data science , social research , computer science , public relations , social science , political science , economics , management , law , data mining , paleontology , biology
New and emerging forms of data, including posts harvested from social media sites such as Twitter, have become part of the sociologist's data diet. In particular, some researchers see an advantage in the perceived 'public' nature of Twitter posts, representing them in publications without seeking informed consent. While such practice may not be at odds with Twitter's terms of service, we argue there is a need to interpret these through the lens of social science research methods that imply a more reflexive ethical approach than provided in 'legal' accounts of the permissible use of these data in research publications. To challenge some existing practice in Twitter-based research, this article brings to the fore: (1) views of Twitter users through analysis of online survey data; (2) the effect of context collapse and online disinhibition on the behaviours of users; and (3) the publication of identifiable sensitive classifications derived from algorithms.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom