z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Resisting Piratic Method by Doing Research Otherwise
Author(s) -
Lisa Tilley
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.847
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1469-8684
pISSN - 0038-0385
DOI - 10.1177/0038038516656992
Subject(s) - undoing , plural , sociology , appropriation , commodification , epistemology , commons , politics , sociology of knowledge , knowledge production , social science , law , political science , psychology , linguistics , philosophy , knowledge management , economics , computer science , market economy , psychotherapist
The reconstruction of sociology into connected sociologies works towards a truly global and plural discipline. But if undoing the overrepresentation of European epistemology in sociology requires a deeper engagement with epistemologies of the South or worlds and knowledges otherwise, how can we ensure that such engagements do not simply reproduce colonial forms of appropriation and domination? Here I consider means of resisting extractive, or ‘piratic’ method in sociology research by drawing lessons from recent debates around geopiracy and biopiracy in geography and the life sciences. The core claim of this article is that any decolonial knowledge production must involve a consideration of the political economy of knowledge – its forms of extraction, points of commodification, how it is refined as intellectual property, and how it comes to alienate participating knowers. Against this I suggest a relearning of method in an anti-piratic way as a means of returning our work to the intellectual commons.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom