Demographics and (Equal?) Voice: Assessing Participation in Online Deliberative Sessions
Author(s) -
Ryan Kennedy,
Anand E. Sokhey,
Claire Abernathy,
Kevin Esterling,
David Lazer,
Amy Lee,
William Minozzi,
Michael A. Neblo
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
political studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.406
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1467-9248
pISSN - 0032-3217
DOI - 10.1177/0032321719890805
Subject(s) - deliberation , demographics , deliberative democracy , optimism , psychology , democracy , inequality , social psychology , public relations , political science , sociology , demography , mathematics , politics , law , mathematical analysis
Critics of deliberative democracy have worried that deliberation may mirror (or even exacerbate) inequalities in participation across categories such as gender, race, and age. Accordingly, we investigate the potential for technology and design to ameliorate these concerns, looking at the extent to which online deliberative sessions facilitate inclusive participation. In a large study of online deliberation (over 1600 participants nested in hundreds of online sessions), we examine differences in the amount and nature of participation across demographic categories, as well as the effect of forum characteristics on such differences. Though our results are mixed, we read them with cautious optimism: the online format is not immune to inequalities in participation and satisfaction, but we do not observe differences across some demographics, and most observed differences are substantively minor. Moreover, features of online deliberation environments show promise for addressing some of the problems plaguing in-person designs.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom