z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prompted Word Replacement in Active and Passive Sentences
Author(s) -
Percy H. Tannenbaum,
Frederick Williams
Publication year - 1968
Publication title -
language and speech
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.713
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1756-6053
pISSN - 0023-8309
DOI - 10.1177/002383096801100402
Subject(s) - verb , subject (documents) , object (grammar) , linguistics , focus (optics) , computer science , word (group theory) , causative , natural language processing , passive voice , linkage (software) , artificial intelligence , psychology , philosophy , physics , biochemistry , chemistry , library science , optics , gene
A conceptual focus formulation developed in a prior study of encoding of active and passive sentences led to predictions concerning how such sentences are stored and their main semantic units are retrieved from memory. The formulation posed a dominant subject-verb linkage in active sentences but an object-verb linkage characterizing passive sentences. Individuals were presented with either the subject, or verb, or object of previous exposed sentences and were required to replace the other two missing words. As anticipated, the subject was a better prompt for the verb in active than in passive sentences but the reverse relationship obtained when the object was the cue. Similar predictions for situations when the verb was the prompt word were supported when the subject was the response but not when the objects were to be replaced.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom