z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Impact of a six-month empowerment-based exercise intervention programme in non-physically active adolescent Swedish girls
Author(s) -
EvaCarin Lindgren,
Amir Baigi,
Erwin Apitzsch,
Håkan Bergh
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
health education journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.421
H-Index - 34
eISSN - 1748-8176
pISSN - 0017-8969
DOI - 10.1177/0017896910379366
Subject(s) - empowerment , physical therapy , mann–whitney u test , intervention (counseling) , wilcoxon signed rank test , test (biology) , self efficacy , randomized controlled trial , psychology , physical fitness , medicine , clinical psychology , social psychology , psychiatry , paleontology , surgery , political science , law , biology
Objective: This study evaluated changes in self-efficacy in non-physically active adolescent girls (13–19 years old) who participated in a six-month, empowerment-based exercise intervention programme (EIP). Design: The study used a pre- and post-test randomized group design and included one pre- and one post-test (at six months) and non-physically active adolescent girls (N = 110) were assigned to an intervention group (n = 54) or a comparison group (n = 56). Setting: Two upper secondary schools and five secondary schools, located in the low socio-economic areas of two communities in southern Sweden were involved in the study. Method: The Swedish version of a 10-item General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) and the Social Barriers to Exercise Self-efficacy Questionnaire (SPBESQ) were used. In addition, BMI and results from a physical fitness test were measured. For statistical analysis, the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Wilcoxon’s matched-pairs signed-rank test were used. Results: Analysis showed a statistically significant difference in GSES scores (p = 0.037) between the groups after the EIP was implemented. Girls in the intervention group had increased their levels of general perceived self-efficacy (p = 0.004). Both groups increased their level of physical fitness (intervention, p = 0.06 and control, p = 0.013). BMI increased in the control group (p = 0.031). Conclusions: The EIP had an impact on adolescent girls’ general perceived self-efficacy and can be regarded as an outcome of empowerment that indicates the development of the adolescent girls’ ability to effectively deal with a variety of stressful situations in general

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom