z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Application of Two Spatial Verification Methods to Ensemble Forecasts of Low-Level Rotation
Author(s) -
Patrick S. Skinner,
Louis J. Wicker,
Dustan M. Wheatley,
Kent H. Knopfmeier
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
weather and forecasting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.393
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1520-0434
pISSN - 0882-8156
DOI - 10.1175/waf-d-15-0129.1
Subject(s) - tornado , forecast verification , rotation (mathematics) , azimuth , computer science , displacement (psychology) , meteorology , geodesy , forecast skill , statistics , mathematics , geology , artificial intelligence , geography , psychology , geometry , psychotherapist
Two spatial verification methods are applied to ensemble forecasts of low-level rotation in supercells: a four-dimensional, object-based matching algorithm and the displacement and amplitude score (DAS) based on optical flow. Ensemble forecasts of low-level rotation produced using the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) Experimental Warn-on-Forecast System are verified against WSR-88D single-Doppler azimuthal wind shear values interpolated to the model grid. Verification techniques are demonstrated using four 60-min forecasts issued at 15-min intervals in the hour preceding development of the 20 May 2013 Moore, Oklahoma, tornado and compared to results from two additional forecasts of tornadic supercells occurring during the springs of 2013 and 2014. The object-based verification technique and displacement component of DAS are found to reproduce subjectively determined forecast characteristics in successive forecasts for the 20 May 2013 event, as well as to discriminate in subjective forecast quality between different events. Ensemble-mean, object-based measures quantify spatial and temporal displacement, as well as storm motion biases in predicted low-level rotation in a manner consistent with subjective interpretation. Neither method produces useful measures of the intensity of low-level rotation, owing to deficiencies in the verification dataset and forecast resolution.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here