z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Improving Polarimetric C-Band Radar Rainfall Estimation with Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometer Observations in Eastern China
Author(s) -
Gang Chen,
Kun Zhao,
Guifu Zhang,
Hao Huang,
Su Liu,
Long Wen,
Zhichao Yang,
Zhengwei Yang,
Lili Xu,
Wei Zhu
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of hydrometeorology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.733
H-Index - 123
eISSN - 1525-755X
pISSN - 1525-7541
DOI - 10.1175/jhm-d-16-0215.1
Subject(s) - disdrometer , squall line , rainband , meteorology , typhoon , environmental science , radar , climatology , precipitation , precipitation types , polarimetry , drizzle , atmospheric sciences , geology , rain gauge , geography , physics , computer science , optics , telecommunications , scattering
In this study, the capability of using a C-band polarimetric Doppler radar and a two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD) to estimate monsoon-influenced summer rainfall during the Observation, Prediction and Analysis of Severe Convection of China (OPACC) field campaign in 2014 and 2015 in eastern China is investigated. Three different rainfall R estimators, for reflectivity at horizontal polarization [R(Zh)], for reflectivity at horizontal polarization and differential reflectivity factor [R(Zh, Zdr)], and for specific differential phase [R(KDP)], are derived from 2-yr 2DVD observations of summer precipitation systems. The radar-estimated rainfall is compared to gauge observations from eight rainfall episodes. Results show that the two polarimetric estimators, R(Zh, Zdr) and R(KDP), perform better than the traditional Zh–R relation [i.e., R(Zh)]. The KDP-based estimator [i.e., R(KDP)] produces the best rainfall accumulations. The radar rainfall estimators perform differently across the three organized convective systems (mei-yu rainband, typhoon rainband, and squall line). Estimator R(Zh) overestimates rainfall in the mei-yu rainband and squall line, and R(Zh, Zdr) mitigates the overestimation in the mei-yu rainband but has a large bias in the squall line. QPE from R(KDP) is the most accurate among the three estimators, but it possesses a relatively large bias for the squall line compared to the mei-yu case. The high variability of drop size distribution (DSD) related to the precipitation microphysics in different types of rain is largely responsible for the case-dependent QPE performance using any single radar rainfall estimator. The squall line has a distinct ice-phase process with a large mean size of raindrops, while the mei-yu rainband and typhoon rainband are composed of smaller raindrops. Based on the statistical QPE error in the ZH–ZDR space, a new composite rainfall estimator is constructed by combining R(Zh), R(Zh, Zdr), and R(KDP) and is proven to outperform any single rainfall estimator.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here