z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Uncertainty of Concentration–Terrestrial Carbon Feedback in Earth System Models*
Author(s) -
Tomohiro Hajima,
Kaoru Tachiiri,
Akihiko Ito,
Michio Kawamiya
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of climate
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.315
H-Index - 287
eISSN - 1520-0442
pISSN - 0894-8755
DOI - 10.1175/jcli-d-13-00177.1
Subject(s) - carbon cycle , earth system science , carbon fibers , environmental science , biogeochemical cycle , greenhouse gas , positive feedback , terrestrial ecosystem , climate change , ecosystem , productivity , atmospheric sciences , carbon sequestration , carbon dioxide , computer science , chemistry , ecology , environmental chemistry , oceanography , geology , macroeconomics , engineering , organic chemistry , algorithm , composite number , electrical engineering , economics , biology
Carbon uptake by land and ocean as a biogeochemical response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration is called concentration–carbon feedback and is one of the carbon cycle feedbacks of the global climate. This feedback can have a major impact on climate projections with an uncertain magnitude. This paper focuses on the concentration–carbon feedback in terrestrial ecosystems, analyzing the mechanisms and strength of the feedback reproduced by Earth system models (ESMs) participating in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. It is confirmed that multiple ESMs driven by a common scenario show a large spread of concentration–carbon feedback strength among models. Examining the behavior of the carbon fluxes and pools of the models showed that the sensitivity of plant productivity to elevated CO2 is likely the key to reduce the spread, although increasing CO2 stimulates other carbon cycle processes. Simulations with a single ESM driven by different CO2 pathways demonstrated that carbon accumulation increases in scenarios with slower CO2 increase rates. Using both numerical and analytical approaches, the study showed that the difference among CO2 scenarios is a time lag of terrestrial carbon pools in response to atmospheric CO2 increase—a high rate of CO2 increase results in smaller carbon accumulations than that in an equilibrium state of a given CO2 concentration. These results demonstrate that the current quantities for concentration–carbon feedback are incapable of capturing the feedback dependency on the carbon storage state and suggest that the concentration feedback can be larger for future scenarios where the CO2 growth rate is reduced.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here