z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
High-Precision Measurements of the Copolar Correlation Coefficient: Non-Gaussian Errors and Retrieval of the Dispersion Parameter μ in Rainfall
Author(s) -
W. J. Keat,
C. D. Westbrook,
Anthony J. Illingworth
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of applied meteorology and climatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.079
H-Index - 134
eISSN - 1558-8432
pISSN - 1558-8424
DOI - 10.1175/jamc-d-15-0272.1
Subject(s) - drizzle , standard deviation , exponential function , gaussian , percentile , cumulative distribution function , probability density function , statistics , environmental science , mathematics , meteorology , physics , precipitation , mathematical analysis , quantum mechanics
The copolar correlation coefficient ρ hv has many applications, including hydrometeor classification, ground clutter and melting-layer identification, interpretation of ice microphysics, and the retrieval of raindrop size distributions (DSDs). However, the quantitative error estimates that are necessary if these applications are to be fully exploited are currently lacking. Previous error estimates of ρ hv rely on knowledge of the unknown “true” ρ hv and implicitly assume a Gaussian probability distribution function of ρ hv samples. Frequency distributions of ρ hv estimates are in fact shown to be highly negatively skewed. A new variable,= log 10 (1 − ρ hv ), is defined that does have Gaussian error statistics and a standard deviation depending only on the number of independent radar pulses. This is verified using observations of spherical drizzle drops, allowing, for the first time, the construction of rigorous confidence intervals in estimates of ρ hv . In addition, the manner in which the imperfect collocation of the horizontal and vertical polarization sample volumes may be accounted for is demonstrated. The possibility of using L to estimate the dispersion parameter μ in the gamma drop size distribution is investigated. Including drop oscillations is found to be essential for this application; otherwise, there could be biases in retrieved μ of up to approximately 8. Preliminary results in rainfall are presented. In a convective rain case study, the estimates presented herein show μ to be substantially larger than 0 (an exponential DSD). In this particular rain event, rain rate would be overestimated by up to 50% if a simple exponential DSD is assumed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here