Open AccessRelating the Drag Coefficient and the Roughness Length over the Sea to the Wavelength of the Peak Waves
Author(s) -
Edgar L. Andreas
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of physical oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.706
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1520-0485
pISSN - 0022-3670
DOI - 10.1175/2009jpo4189.1
Subject(s) - drag coefficient , wavelength , drag , roughness length , correlation coefficient , scaling , length scale , surface finish , physics , wave height , standard deviation , mathematics , dispersion (optics) , mechanics , significant wave height , wind wave , surface roughness , scale (ratio) , mathematical analysis , optics , statistics , geometry , wind speed , meteorology , materials science , thermodynamics , wind profile power law , composite material , quantum mechanics
The standard 10-m reference height for computing the drag coefficient over the sea is admittedly arbitrary. The literature contains occasional suggestions that a scaling length based on the wavelength of the peak waves λp is a more natural reference height. Attempts to confirm this hypothesis must be done carefully, however, because of the potential for fictitious correlation between nondimensional dependent and independent variables. With the DMAJ dataset as an example, this study reviews the issue of fictitious correlation in analyses that use λp/2 as the reference height for evaluating the drag coefficient and that use kp (=2π/λp) as a scale for the roughness length z0. (The DMAJ dataset is a compilation of four individual datasets; D, M, A, and J, respectively, identify the lead authors of the four studies: Donelan, Merzi, Anctil, and Janssen.) This dataset has been used in several previous studies to evaluate the dependence of kpz0 and the drag coefficient evaluated at λp/2 on the nondimensional wave parameter ω* = ωpu*/g. Here ωp is the radian frequency of the peak in the wind–wave spectrum, u* is the friction velocity, and g is the acceleration of gravity. Because the DMAJ dataset does not, however, include independent measurements of λp and ωp, λp had to be inferred from measurements of ωp through the wave dispersion relation. The presence of ωp in both the dependent and independent variables, therefore, exacerbates the fictitious correlation. One conclusion, thus, is that using λp to formulate the drag coefficient and the nondimensional roughness length as functions of a nondimensional variable that includes ωp requires a dataset with independent measurements of λp and ωp.