Open AccessObservations of Seven African Easterly Waves in the East Atlantic during 2006
Author(s) -
Jonathan Zawislak,
Edward J. Zipser
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of the atmospheric sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.853
H-Index - 173
eISSN - 1520-0469
pISSN - 0022-4928
DOI - 10.1175/2009jas3118.1
Subject(s) - tropical wave , african easterly jet , climatology , cyclogenesis , geology , trough (economics) , equatorial waves , dropsonde , atmospheric wave , vorticity , meteorology , rogue wave , amplitude , tropical cyclogenesis , potential vorticity , gravity wave , tropical cyclone , atmospheric sciences , vortex , wave propagation , cyclone (programming language) , geography , physics , geodesy , latitude , macroeconomics , field programmable gate array , computer science , quantum mechanics , equator , nonlinear system , computer hardware , economics
The African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analyses (AMMA) experiment and its downstream NASA extension, NAMMA, provide an unprecedented detailed look at the vertical structure of consecutive African easterly waves. During August and September 2006, seven easterly waves passed through the NAMMA domain: two waves developed into Tropical Cyclones Debby and Helene, two waves did not develop, and three waves were questionable in their role in the development of Ernesto, Florence, and Gordon. NCEP Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) analyses are used to describe the track of both the vorticity maxima and midlevel wave trough associated with each of the seven easterly waves. Dropsonde data from NAMMA research flights are used to describe the observed wind structure and as a tool to evaluate the accuracy of the GDAS to resolve the structure of the wave. Finally, satellite data are used to identify the relationship between convection and the organization of the wind structure. Results support a necessary distinction between the large-scale easterly wave trough and smaller-scale vorticity centers within the wave. An important wave-to-wave variability is observed: for NAMMA waves, those waves that have a characteristically high-amplitude wave trough and well-defined low-level circulations (well organized) may contain less rainfall, do not necessarily develop, and are well resolved in the analysis, whereas low-amplitude (weakly organized) NAMMA waves may have stronger vorticity centers and large persistent raining areas and may be more likely to develop, but are not well resolved in the analysis.