Open AccessCharacteristics of Vertical Velocity Cores in Different Convective Systems Observed over Gadanki, India
Author(s) -
K. N. Uma,
T. Narayana Rao
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
monthly weather review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.862
H-Index - 179
eISSN - 1520-0493
pISSN - 0027-0644
DOI - 10.1175/2008mwr2677.1
Subject(s) - convection , geology , mesoscale meteorology , atmospheric sciences , altitude (triangle) , deep convection , free convective layer , convection cell , meteorology , climatology , natural convection , geometry , physics , combined forced and natural convection , mathematics
The Indian mesosphere–stratosphere–troposphere (MST) radar measurements during the passage of 60 convective systems are used to study the vertical air velocity (w) characteristics of tropical convection. The up- and downdraft cores and various stages/types of convection (shallow, deep, and decaying) are discerned from radar time–intensity maps of w. The characteristics of cores (speed, size, orientation, vertical extent, gravity wave activity, etc.) at different stages of convection are discussed with the help of three case studies. The cores stratified based on the type of convection are mostly erect in nature in all types of convective systems, except for deep updraft cores. A considerable percentage (35%) of deep updraft cores show inclined structure with elevation angles as low as 0°–20°. The variation of the horizontal wind field with height and the internal dynamics of mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) are thought to be responsible for this geometry. Further, the vertical extent of draft cores is limited in all types of convection, except for deep updraft cores. About 77% of deep updraft cores have a vertical extent greater than 10 km and ∼23% of these cores reach an altitude of 16 km. The size (overpass time) of the core shows an increasing trend with altitude up to 10–12 km and then decreases. Among different types of convection, the size of core is larger for deep updraft cores and smaller for shallow updraft cores. The variation of w distribution with height is different for different convection categories. The mode (and also the mean) of the distribution shows low-level descent (below 3 km) and mid–high-level ascent in shallow and deep convection categories, while nearly uniform distribution is seen in decaying convection. Strong updrafts are seen in deep convective systems in the upper troposphere (of the order of 15–20 m s−1), followed by shallow and decaying systems, while downdrafts are generally weaker in all types of convection. The variability (within the cores and also with altitude) and the number of data points are larger in updraft cores than in downdraft cores corresponding to shallow and deep convection. Contrasting the composite w profile at Gadanki with those obtained elsewhere revealed interesting features: the absence of subsidence at higher levels, the presence of low-level subsidence, a single ascent peak in the middle troposphere, etc. Further, the magnitude of composite w derived from wind profiler measurements is larger than that obtained with other techniques.