
Reply
Author(s) -
Ronald M. Errico,
Péter Bauer,
JeanFrançois Mahfouf
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of the atmospheric sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.853
H-Index - 173
eISSN - 1520-0469
pISSN - 0022-4928
DOI - 10.1175/2008jas2817.1
Subject(s) - exposition (narrative) , epistemology , set (abstract data type) , work (physics) , computer science , engineering ethics , philosophy , physics , engineering , art , literature , thermodynamics , programming language
This is a reply to a set of criticisms regarding a previously published work. It briefly addresses the main criticisms. In particular, it explains why some papers identified as having some fundamental flaws were referenced in the original work without detailed exposition of those flaws. It also explains why parts of the conclusions criticized as being contradictory are, in fact, not. It further highlights the need for more publishing of scientific criticisms.